Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Arnaldi vs Borna Gojo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Arnaldi vs Gojo analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Arnaldi vs Borna Gojo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Arnaldi 1 - 0 Gojo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Arnaldi has won 51.56% of points on their second serve, while Gojo has won 49.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Arnaldi, in recent form, has won 49.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gojo has won 43.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.48% and 22.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Arnaldi has saved 61.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gojo has saved 22.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Arnaldi has won 65.71% of matches played (W/L 46/ 24), with Gojo winning 57.14% (W/L 16/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Arnaldi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 124/ 60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19). Gojo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 117/ 66), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Arnaldi has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 16/ 11), where as Gojo has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Arnaldi winning 1 times and Gojo being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Arnaldi winning 2 and Gojo winning 0. The last match between Arnaldi and Gojo was at the Murcia Challenger, 09-04-2023, Final, Clay with Matteo Arnaldi getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Arnaldi and Gojo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Arnaldi winning 0 times and Gojo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Arnaldi winning 1, and Gojo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Arnaldi has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.6 while Gojo has played against players with an average rank of 183.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Arnaldi has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gojo has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Arnaldi has converted 37.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gojo has converted 25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
35
Rank
35
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
158
Rank
72
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
64% (206-118)
Career Total W/L
59% (229-159)
59% (19-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$1,637,595
Career Prize Money
$581,225
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matteo Arnaldi | Borna Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:20 | 2:0:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (47/86) | 61% (44/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (35/47) | 68% (30/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (18/39) | 46% (13/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (29/72) | 38% (33/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Borna Gojo
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Arnaldi | Borna Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (19/13) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (48/34) | 33% (2/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (422/392) | 42% (21/29) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.88 |
| Aces Total | 228 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 93 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:25 | 1:40:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 192.72 | 388 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1512/2664) | 61% (93/152) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1077/1512) | 68% (63/93) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (594/1152) | 49% (29/59) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (98/263) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (1013/2646) | 30% (43/143) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (14/26) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (13/4) | 0% (1/0) |
Matteo Arnaldi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Andrey Rublev
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
64 of
123)
13
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
116
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(6) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Alexandre Muller
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
43%
(
23 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
43%
(
51 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
87)
116
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Fils
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
115
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Fabio Fognini
45%
(
25 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Harold Mayot
53%
(
57 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
39 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Christopher O'Connell
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Borna Gojo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Borna Gojo
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
10
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Borna Gojo
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Borna Gojo
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
12
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Tommy Paul
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Aslan Karatsev
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Borna Gojo
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
76%
(
72 of
95)
18
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
54 of
72)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
39 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Borna Gojo
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
18 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Frances Tiafoe
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
88%
(
67 of
76)
14
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Borna Gojo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
73 of
114)
12
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
8
88%
(
45 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Arnaldi Vs Gojo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
